State immune to lawsuit in ankle injury on popular M-22

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SUTTONS BAY, Mich. (AP) — In a victory for state and local governments, the Michigan Supreme Court says the Michigan Department of Transportation is immune to a lawsuit by a pedestrian who broke her ankle on a popular road.

The issue is whether a parallel parking lane on M-22 in Suttons Bay was designed for vehicular travel. In a 4-3 decision Thursday, the court said no, which means the state is immune under Michigan law to Helen Yono’s lawsuit.

The state, county road commissions and insurers had urged the Supreme Court to overturn a decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals, which set a new standard for road liability.

Yono sued after falling into a depression. Justice Joan Larsen says the lane was marked as a parking area with no indication that it was designed for travel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s