President: U.S. Should Take Military Action Against Syria

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

01-16-13 Obama gun control speechWASHINGTON D.C. (CNN)- ┬áPresident Barack Obama said that the United States “should take military action against Syrian targets” in a Rose Garden address Saturday. However, he said he would seek congressional authorization when federal lawmakers return from recess.

The president appealed for congressional leaders to consider their responsibilities and values in debating U.S. military action in Syria over its alleged chemical weapons use.”Some things are more important than partisan differences or the politics of the moment,” he said. “Today I’m asking Congress to send a message to the world that we are united as one nation.”

U.N. inspectors returned from Syria carrying evidence about whether an attack last week in a Damascus suburb included the use of chemical weapons.
“The aim of the game here, the mandate, is very clear — and that is to ascertain whether chemical weapons were used and not by whom,” U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters Saturday.
The team arrived in the Netherlands earlier in the day with information about the August 21 attack, which British and U.S. intelligence reports say included chemical weapons.
“It needs time to be able to analyze the information and the samples,” Nesirky said.
He noted that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said there is no alternative to a political solution to the crisis in Syria. “A military solution is not an option,” he said.
White House, lawmakers huddle on Syria ‘We have to do something’ about Syria What steps will the U.S. take in Syria? McCain: Syria is different from Iraq
Obama has proposed a limited military action to dissuade Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from using chemical weapons against his people, as the administration contends has occurred multiple times.
But more consultations are needed with Congress and allies before any “response” is taken, a senior U.S. official told CNN Saturday. It was not clear what implications this might have for the timing of any possible U.S. strike on Syria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Brandon

    Congratulations to all those who voted him in. Another war means higher taxes and higher fuel cost. Great job voters! The world already knows "we are united as one nation". It's time we take care of issues at home and stop dealing with countries that have nothing to do with us.

  • John

    The same man who at the time was a Senator that asked congress to impeach Bush for EXACTLY the same action-
    Now the U.S is going to fight FOR the same people who attacked us on 9/11 ?

  • Richard Post

    We need to stop being the world police, we need to sending all the other countries money and start taking care of our own people. The other governments are not using the money we send for anything that would help their people.