Locey trial juror speaks out about guilty verdict

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Juror Speaks Out About Murder Trial

CENTREVILLE, Mich. – The David Locey murder trial was an emotional experience for a community in St. Joseph County.

Andy Brown, 37, was found guilty of second degree murder in the shooting death of his employer, a prominent accountant in Sturgis.

That was in October; today, Locey family got some closure as they leaned Brown’s fate.

FOX 17 spoke with one the 12 jurors deciding Brown’s fate, Renee Towers.

“ We thought long and hard about our decision and it wasn’t an easy decision to come to,” Towers said.

She says no one knows exactly what happened that night.

“Mr. Locey knew whoever was in that office with him, that he felt comfortable with whoever was in that office with him,” Towers said.

She says Brown’s cell phone records putting him in the area of Locey’s Sturgis accounting firm helped make her decision, along with gunpowder residue.

“For a man who claims to be afraid of guns and not shoot guns, to have even small amounts of gunshot residue is just , it puts him there, it puts him as being the one holding the weapon,” she said.

Towers says she has no doubt it was Brown who pulled the trigger.

“I believe Mr. Brown got extremely angry and resorted to killing Mr. Locey,” she said.

Towers said she knew from the beginning of deliberations she had decided on a guilty verdict.

As for a punishment, she says Brown should receive life, never having a chance for freedom.

“I watched his reaction during the reading of the verdict and all I saw was a cold, heartless man who showed no emotion whatsoever as his fate was handed to him,” she said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • bobbie stamper

    As one of the jurors i believed that this lady cannot speak for everybody,my opnion was different then hers,

    • Jon C.

      I don’t think that is how the judicial system is supposed to work when you “know” from the beginning that he “is” guilty. Innocent till proven guilty? Sounds like this juror didn’t see things that way. I wasn’t there, I didn’t deliberate, or sit in the jury, never listened to the examination, or cross examination, but I know that you must be proven guilty, not proven innocent.