Dozens speak in favor of GRPD body cameras at city commission meeting

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. -- More than two dozen people spoke in favor of Grand Rapids police officers wearing body cameras at Tuesday night's city commission meeting, which had a standing room only crowd.

Though the issue wasn't on the meeting agenda, the non-profit group LINC Community Revitalization organized a group to attend and speak about the issue as part of their #OperationBodyCamGRMI initiative.

No decision was made, but city leaders are promising "swift action," calling this a "moment full of opportunity."

The idea of outfitting police officers with body cameras has picked up steam in the recent months following the shooting death of Michael Brown, an unarmed African American teenager, who was killed by Darren Wilson, a white officer in Ferguson, Mo.

Among the main arguments of body camera proponents: accountability, both for police and the public.

"The thinking tonight was we needed the community's voice to be put into policy," said Darel Ross, co-founder of LINC.

"Right now we have a justice system that appears to not be working at times, and we have technology that could bridge the gap, and we want citizens to inform that process."

Of the roughly 25-30 people who spoke during public remarks, none were in opposition to police wearing body cameras. Several speakers shared their own stories of either being racially profiled by police officers or fearing officers rather than looking to them people who would protect them.

"I come to you today saying I'm too strong to stand down to police that do me wrong," said Michael Scruggs, chairman  of the Kent County Black Caucus. "I have had them do me wrong, so maybe these cameras will keep me alive or keep somebody I know alive."

Grand Rapids Police Chief David Rahinsky has spoken out publicly against putting body cameras on his officers, citing concerns over lack of privacy and the fact the footage could be made available to any member of the public through the Freedom of Information Act. Speaking to reporters after the meeting Tuesday night, Rahinsky said he still had concerns about implementing the technology.

"I don’t think I ever expressed I was opposed, I expressed reservations based on lack of study," he said. "I appreciate the community coming forward and as being as forthcoming as they were.”

Commissioners voted Tuesday night to set a formal public hearing on the issue for Dec. 16 at 7 p.m. at City Hall. A vote on the issue could come as early as mid-January, according to City Manager Greg Sundstrom.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • tracyd112

    What about accountability from the citizens of Grand rapids to ACT like they have sense.People do not have the right to start verbally abusing the Police when stopped for questioning .The majority of people act civilized when stopped by the police but when stopped and you all of a sudden start yelling saying why did you stop me and trying to take control of the situation you lose. When you are not raised with manners you have already lost as Yes Sir or Mam goes a long way.I used to be one that jumped out of the car and started acting stupid but it got me no where as the Police must take control of the situation or they already put themselfs in danger.Why dont we ask Employees of every Job to wear body cameras to work?

  • CommonSense

    A question to these people who now want GRPD to wear cameras-not to mention everything else they are wearing while on duty…..how many of you have voted to approve taxes when the police department has asked for additional funding? The cameras will do nothing. The schools, daycares and everyone else these days seem to be filling a need to babysit everyone’s children who are not taken care of at home. The police are not babysitters. Yes, there is always a few bad ones, as in any other profession. However, take a look around your neighborhood, you would be quite surprised to see how much you are already on camera and don’t realize it. We simply have no need for officers to implement this idea. How much more are we as a free country going to allow big brother to watch us, especially when a huge part of society already can’t and refuse to take care of themselves??? Maybe we should provide birth control to go with the cameras??? Just a thought!