Despite fluoride fight, John George says he’s most policy-heavy GR mayoral candidate

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

This week, FOX 17 is sitting down with each of the four candidates vying to be the next mayor of Grand Rapids, to find out where they stand on issues facing the city and why they ultimately chose to run.

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. -- He's a retired engineer who has never held political office, but now John George is one of four candidates vying to be the next mayor of Grand Rapids.

While George might be a virtual unknown to many voters, he's managed to make a name for himself based on one particular issue: removing fluoride from the city's water.

“Obviously the reason I got into this, I did a lot of research into fluoride and realized that what they thought they were doing in 1945 using 1945 science is really no longer applicable today," George told FOX 17.

"I went before the current city mayor and commission and was basically ignored.”

But George contends the fluoride issue is far from what he's all about, quickly pointing to his website packed with policy statements on several issues ranging from trash collection to climate change.

“This is my way to communicate with people and let them know who I am. Two of the other candidates have track records," he said.

“I guess I could just put my hat in the ring and do what they do--which is basically nothing--give a few speeches and hope people like my face or whatever and want to vote for me. But I want to give people a good indicator of who I am.”

George, a self-described libertarian, also takes on an issue that FOX 17 has covered extensively: reforming civil asset forfeiture laws.

“I think if more people knew what it was, they would agree with me, it’s just not right," he said. "It's another issue, it shows people my opinion that there should be limits on government."

When it comes to police-community relations, George said the city's on the right track implementing new policing policy and using officer body cameras.

Similar to his competitor Robert Dean, George contends the biggest issue facing the city, aside from fluoride, is addressing the city's unfunded liabilities and legacy costs. Current commissioner and mayoral candidate Rosalynn Bliss has countered those claims repeatedly, saying they simply aren't true and that the city is on 'stable' financial grounds after years of hard work.

“I’m in this for the good of this city, mainly health-wise because fluoride is a health issue, but (voters) should also realize I’m not a one issue candidate.”

George told FOX 17 his campaign has kept a low profile, largely due to the fact he said he's refused to take donations to avoid being 'beholden' to anyone. Campaign finance records from the Kent County Clerk's Office show George has raised just over $200, all of which came from his own money.

Compared to other candidates, current commissioner Rosalynn Bliss has raised more than $90,000, former city commissioner Robert Dean has raised more than $16,000.

"I have been offered backing but I’ve refused it and that hurts me because I can’t get yard signs, I’m not doing robo calls," he said. "I’m really not doing this for me, this is not the first step on my long political career, I mean this is it.”

The primary mayoral race is set for Aug. 4. If a candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote they will become the city’s next mayor. If not, the top two vote-getters will compete in a run-off election in November.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • Grand Rapids Dentist

    If the only “research” george has done on the fluoride issue was the information from 1945, hes grossly under educated on the topic. Fluoride is one of the great public health achievements in history, having an incredible impact on the single most prevalent disease affecting children in the United States. I see the difference everyday in people from unfluoridated communities and fluoridated communities. The bogus quasi-science he likely found on the internet written by some half-wit blogger does not count as research, and looking at the MOUNTAIN of clinical evidence supporting community water fluoridation would help a lot of people understand its usefulness. Fortunately, this guy doesnt stand a chance…

    • verity

      As a dentist, are you qualified to determine the physiological and neurological effects of fluoridated water? Your input regarding the dental effects may be accurate, but that’s your expertise. I wouldn’t ask a cardiologist about my colon. Fluoride in toothpaste and rinses makes sense, but putting it in the water for ingestion has to raise concerns in everyone’s minds. Also, just because information is posted online (or as you patronizingly put it, “found on the internet”), in no way diminishes it. The entire corpora of many great authors can be found online. The information regarding the benefits and damage of fluoride is well-documented and compiled in scientific and thoughtful ways, including a number of high-profile scientific studies. If we are to begin discounting information and opinions online, should we start with yours?