Having trouble receiving FOX 17? Click here:

Prosecutor to discontinue use of ‘Anxiety War’ videos as evidence against accused sex predators

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. – The man behind the “Anxiety War” vigilante-like justice videos, designed to catch alleged sexual predators, told FOX 17 he’s not stopping, despite the Kent County prosecutor stating they will no longer use his videos as evidence.

Wednesday, Kent County Prosecutor William Forsyth issued a letter to Zach Sweers, 23, asking him to stop his “freelance law enforcement and leave this to professionals.”

Sweers told FOX 17 he works full-time at his day job and said he doesn’t want to be a cop, but is continuing to lure and catch accused sexual predators.

In his latest video posted to Anxiety War’s site April 30, Sweers and his brother, who openly carried a firearm, confronted their latest alleged predator.

Walking up to the man’s car window, Sweers pushed, “Are you serious? You know exactly why I’m here. Exactly. You sent me a photo wearing that, you thought I was a 14-year-old girl and you wanted to have sex.”

It’s his latest publicly shared sting operation working on his latest catch: luring accused sex predators after texting and chat room conversation posing, in this case, as a 14-year-old girl.

Recently these videos, given to police, landed seven men with felonies, but Forsyth and Grand Rapids Police said no more.

In his letter Forsyth wrote to Sweers: “what you are doing can be dangerous.”

He highlighted the last video stating by having someone assist you who was openly carrying a firearm can allow anyone to “easily mistake the situation for a robbery, extortion attempt, or other crime, and respond with a weapon of his own.”

Forsyth went out to write that all of this could “undermine your credibility” in court, stating “the defense will likely argue that ‘you are so intent on proving your point that you would do anything, including falsifying evidence, to further your vigilante campaign.’”

FOX 17 also spoke with lawyer and Distinguished Professor Emeritus Curt Benson who discussed several ethical issues here.

“I really appreciate the dilemma that the prosecutor is in because after all, somebody brought to him evidence of a very, very serious crime,” said Benson. “And a prosecuting attorney although in theory has the discretion to say, look I’m not going to pursue this, you can’t ask any prosecutor to say I’m just going to ignore evidence of a very serious crime.”

Benson said the crux of this dilemma is not whether this is credible evidence, rather if it will be admissible in court.

“As in this case, you’re playing amateur police officer, amateur detective, you’re gathering evidence, I promise you they’re not gathering the evidence in such a way that it’s going to be admissible,” said Benson.  “It requires a certain level of expertise that the lay public doesn’t have that the police officers do.”

Another underlying issue: this behavior, Benson, said puts Sweers and the accused at risk, especially publicizing their identities online.  He doesn’t doubt copycats are already off and running.

“The cat’s already out of the bag and the local prosecutor and the local police can say well this is how we’re going to proceed, but it’s already out there,” said Benson.  “I can promise you that there’s going to be more people doing this.”

FOX 17 also spoke with Sgt. Terry Dixon with the GRPD who reiterated: they do not condone this behavior, and if the prosecutor is not using these videos as evidence, then police aren’t either.

When asked why the seven previous men were charged  but no further charges will be issued from Anxiety War evidence, the prosecutor’s office declined comment and deferred to their letter.

Benson said the cases of the seven men facing felonies are in negotiations. He said it’s unlikely any of the evidence in those cases will be admissible into court, and believes it’s a matter of time before those accused men sue Sweers.

In response to this update, Sweers posted the following message on his Facebook page:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • redman9143

    It’s not open-carry if you conceal a weapon. If his brother doesn’t have a CCW he’s breaking the law.

  • Commonsense

    I’ll think of this idiot when I read his obituary and say to myself, “this clown wouldn’t listen, sucks to be you.” Your arrogance and self rightousbess is astounding. Let the law do their jobs, you are a jackhole!

    • Yup

      At least he would have died doing what he felt was right. As a Soldier we die not always for what we believe but for what we are called to do. God Bless America. And those that keep it safe.

      • Big Gus

        If you believe potentially aiding child sex predatots by interfeing in police investigations – and if you approve of publicly threatening & shaming fellow citizens as child molesters despite their legal innocence of any crime – I rejoice that you are no longer on active duty and pray you have no other authority affecting fellow Americans.

        Thank you for for your service, and happy Memorial Day to you.

  • Yup

    I understand where William is coming from but sadly with all the crime committing losers in Grand Rapids and Michigan it’s time for the people to stand up we just like law enforcement are tired of crime and yes there is a right and wrong but as long as the individual does not use violence or threats to engage the suspect it should be admissible in court I’m not condoning Death Wish but a society that is standing hard to protect the streets and its friends and family deserve a bit of thanks too. Thank You to all that make or streets safe.

  • Jessica StAmand

    I think that what Zach Sweers is doing is good and I do not believe he would falsify evidence. Hes nicer to child predators then most people would be and no to mention he cares way too much about this to risk falsifying evidence. I honestly feel that law enforcement are angry because hes doing something better then they are. Do not get me wrong, I love the law enforcement but there are some things such as pedophilia and child abuse that need more attention. They say “oh we worry for your safety so we aren’t going to take your evidence anymore.” What about the children these men are hurting or could hurt? If one of the men that could have been stopped by Zach ends up raping a child or killing a child and this is something that the prosecutor could have stopped then that’s just sick and it practically makes the prosecutor pro predator.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.