The truth about the Hillary Clinton Google conspiracy theory

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Despite what you might have seen online, Google is not manipulating its search results to favor Hillary Clinton.

That conspiracy theory appeared in a viral video Thursday, in which the pop culture site SourceFed claims to show evidence that Google is deliberately altering its results to hide unsavory facts about Clinton.

“SourceFed has discovered that Google has been actively altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” said SourceFed host Matt Lieberman on the video. “We know for a fact.”

But that’s not a fact — it’s utter nonsense. SourceFed’s video stems from a deep misunderstanding about how Google works.

The theory

SourceFed’s “evidence” of Google’s manipulation: Type “Hillary Clinton cri” into a Google search, you get the following results.

“Hillary Clinton crime reform” “HIllary Clinton crisis” “Hillary Clinton Crime Bill 1994”

What?! No “Hillary Clinton criminal charges?”

Indeed, on Bing and Yahoo, typing “Hillary Clinton cri” autofills with terms like “criminal charges,” “crimes,” “criminal record” “cries in New Hampshire” and “criticism.”

The report’s supposed smoking gun is that a Google Trends search reveals that far more people are searching Google for “Hillary Clinton crimes” than “Hillary Clinton crime reform.”

So why would Google put “Hillary Clinton crime reform” as its top result? SourceFed’s Lieberman claims, “Google is burying potential searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton.”

Google similarly doesn’t show “Hillary Clinton indictment” as a result when you type “Hillary Clinton ind.”

Hmmm….

The truth

It sounds convincing. But SourceFed’s reporting is riddled with holes.

Rhea Drysdale, CEO of search engine optimization company Outspoken Media, said in a Medium post Friday that SourceFed picked and chose misleading examples that appeared to prove its point.

The examples that SourceFed chose are factually incorrect. Hillary Clinton has not been charged with a crime. She has not been indicted. Google knows this, and its algorithm actually filters out inaccurate information in autocomplete.

“Our autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name,” a Google spokeswoman said. “Google autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause. Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how autocomplete works.”

To counter SourceFed’s claim, Drysdale showed similar results for Donald Trump, in which “Donald Trump lawsuits” did not show up in autocomplete results when entering “Donald Trump la” into Google. But “Donald Trump laughing” did, despite the fact that far more people are searching about the presumptive Republican nominee’s legal battles.

Discovery Communications, which owns SourceFed, did not respond to a request for comment.

Google is really smart

By typing in just “Hillary Clinton,” Google presents plenty of autocomplete suggestions with negative connotations, including “email” and “Benghazi.”

Searches for those two terms are way more popular than either of the cherry-picked searches that SourceFed included in its video. Google understands that “Hillary Clinton email” and “Hillary Clinton Benghazi” are synonymous with potential criminal charges or indictments, Drysdale said.

“Google understands humans better than we understand ourselves,” Rhea told CNNMoney.

To say that Google is trying to put Clinton in a favorable light by hiding negative search results just isn’t true.

Bing and Yahoo, by contrast, don’t have as complex an algorithm as Google. They interpret search queries far more literally than Google does, which is why they present results that appear to be disparaging to Clinton.

SourceFed claims to have found a smoking gun, but its evidence just doesn’t hold up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • NO PC FOR ME

    Oh bull! I tried it and yes, Google is manipulating search results in Hitlarys favor. And just as bad they are linking Trump to less than favorable results.
    Its real simple, Google Hillary and try and find the truth, you won’t until about page 250.

  • pj alexander

    This article is troll fodder from corporate billionaire owned CNN who admitted on air to a blackout of all positive Bernie Sanders news at the beginning of the year. We who perform deep searches on a daily basis have seen this for ourselves and have been sharing this information through social media outlets with each other for quite a while. It is not a myth, just like the absence of journalistic ethics by CNN and MSNBC and the connection between the Clinton Foundation donors/participants and mainstream media is not a myth. Reporting the news has given way to making the news, but it is the information age so it is being done with many eyes upon them, and history will not be kind to today’s unethical media collusion.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.