Town approves ordinance banning sagging pants

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

TIMMONSVILLE, S.C. – Sagging pants could cost you several hundred dollars in fines in the Timmonsville, South Carolina. The Timmonsville town council approved an ordinance banning sagging pants in a 5-to-1 vote, according to WMBF.

Here is the exact wording of the ordinance:

It shall be unlawful for any person driving or walking in the streets and roads of the Town of Timmonsville to:

(a) Engage in public nudity;

(b) display pornographic material such that others are unwantingly exposed to the same or that minors are able to view the same;

(c) display the flesh of one’s rear-end, behind, or backside during stationary or movement within the city limits;

(d) wear pants, trousers, or shorts such that the known undergarments are intentional [sic] displayed/exposed to the public.

The first offense is punishable by a verbal warning, the second with a written warning and the addition of the sagger’s name to a law enforcement registry, and the third by a fine of as much as $600.

The ordinance is similar to one that passed in South Carolina’s Jasper County in 2008.

“It had become a nuisance to me and most of the citizens of the county,” Jasper County Councilman LeRoy Blackshear told The Columbia State after the passage of that ordinance. “And not just in this county, but in most of the places that you went, in surrounding counties people were wearing their pants below their waistline, and, to me, it just wasn’t the appropriate thing to do.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • steve

    Have fun enforcing that one. Define “baggy”, define “intentional”. I can see non-stop discrimination lawsuits in this. I think it’s a great idea, but it’ll never fly.