Clinton joining recount effort that Trump calls ‘scam’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Washington (CNN) —  Hillary Clinton’s campaign said Saturday it will take part in efforts to push for recounts in several key states, joining with Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who has raised millions of dollars to have votes counted again in Wisconsin.

But, in a post on Medium, Marc Elias, the campaign’s counsel, said the campaign’s own investigation has not uncovered any evidence of hacking of voting systems.

In the campaign’s most detailed comments to date on the recount, Elias wrote that while the campaign was not going to contest the results itself, it has decided now to take part in the effort to “ensure that it is fair to all sides.”

But President-elect Donald Trump on Saturday dismissed the recount and said that “the election is over.”

“The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future,'” Trump said in a statement, which called the recount “ridiculous” in a headline.

The President-elect blasted the Green Party’s effort as a “scam” and accused the party’s nominee, Jill Stein, of trying to reel in donations that she won’t actually spend on a recount.

“This recount is just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn’t even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount,” Trump said. “This is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded, and the results of this election should be respected instead of being challenged and abused, which is exactly what Jill Stein is doing.”

Trump’s statement did not mention Clinton.

Green Party officials filed Friday for a recount in Wisconsin after reports of voting discrepancies.

Wisconsin Green Party co-chairman George Martin said that the party was seeking a “reconciliation of paper records” — a request that would go one step further than a simple recount, which is expected to begin next week, and that he hopes will spur an investigation into the integrity of the state’s voting system.

“This is a process, a first step to examine whether our electoral democracy is working,” Martin said.

Elias said the campaign had been quietly investigating accusations for a while and had received hundreds of requests that it do so.

“Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,” Elias wrote on Medium.

“If Jill Stein follows through as she has promised and pursues recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan, we will take the same approach in those states as well,” he added.

Brian Fallon, spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said the team would not have sought the recount on its own and that they see no evidence of tampering so far.

“We note we are guarding our prerogatives now that someone else has launched a recount. Not sure what you could point to to suggest there is anything here that calls the results into question,” he told CNN.

In addition to Trump’s total combined margin of victory in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania being only about 107,000 votes — by contrast, the Florida margin in Bush-Gore was 537 ballots — Elias said concerns about Russia’s interference in the election continue to raise concerns.

“This election cycle was unique in the degree of foreign interference witnessed throughout the campaign: the U.S. government concluded that Russian state actors were behind the hacks of the Democratic National Committee and the personal email accounts of Hillary for America campaign officials, and just yesterday, the Washington Post reported that the Russian government was behind much of the “fake news” propaganda that circulated online in the closing weeks of the election,” he wrote.

A senior administration official said in a statement that there is no evidence of any hacking.

“The federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on Election Day,” the official said. “As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on Election Day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”

The Clinton campaign has met with lawyers, data scientists and analysts to assess anomalies in the results that would suggest a hacked result. Private meetings with outside experts involved sharing both groups concerns about the data and findings.

Clinton’s team said they investigated every theory presented and examined laws and practices pertaining to recounts, contests and audits.

“And most importantly, we have monitored and staffed the post-election canvasses — where voting machine tapes are compared to poll-books, provisional ballots are resolved, and all of the math is double checked from election night,” Elias said. “During that process, we have seen Secretary Clinton’s vote total grow, so that, today, her national popular vote lead now exceeds more than 2 million votes.”

The campaign plans to move forward in monitoring activities to better understand the results.

“In the coming days, we will continue to perform our due diligence and actively follow all further activities that are to occur prior to the certification of any election results,” he said.

It is “unfortunate” that all states don’t conduct “post-election” audits.

“Wisconsin and Pennsylvania conduct post-election audits using a sampling of precincts. Michigan and many other states still do not,” Elias wrote. “This is unfortunate; it is our strong belief that, in addition to an election canvass, every state should do this basic audit to ensure accuracy and public confidence in the election.”

CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • doug

    the Clintons are never the front runner of crap. they always get someone else to start it and then say “oh that’s what I was thinking” cowards and self centered idiots.

  • steve

    When Kennedy was elected in 1960, the popular vote margin showed he beat Nixon by about 120,000 nationwide. Nixon opted to not ask for a recount. If he had, Cook County, Illinois with Richard Daley as mayor in Chicago, somehow came up with Kennedy beating Nixon by more than 300,000 votes late in the evening. Imagine that! But let some Democrat lose by a small margin and a recount is demanded. Remember the “hanging chad” recount in 2000 in Florida demanded by Democrats? Now this.They’re whiners, pure and simple

  • Jay

    Can somebody explain why Michigan is one of the states they want to recount? All are voting is done on paper then hand scanned and must have a valid ID to vote along with a voters registration . put Hillary Clinton in office and you guys won’t have to worry about protest there will be a war guaranteed ! Trump is are next president deal with it The only thing this recount can even do is show us how Trump won the popular vote as well! we are stronger united then we are divided power to the people

  • J.B.

    Gee they are worried about the “integrity” of the vote…..but lets just recount the states we barely lost in….the states we barely won in…oh..well their “integrity” is just fine…
    Before the election…Oh, HE might not accept the results of the election if things appear funny..what a Loser!
    After the elections…Oh ,WE cannot accept the results of the election because things were close..WE need Integrity!
    if there is anything on this planet more hypocritical than a democrat..i would like to know what it is.
    Absolutely Disgusting…..

  • Jay

    Before I did some research I also believed that I was a Democrat because I grew up poor and considered a Minority but I’m now 33 married work for myself I’m definitely not a Democrat and definitely not a republican that’s why I voted for Donald Trump because he’s independent just like me

  • Jay

    I would suggest anybody who believes they are a Democrat to watch Hillary’s America. I’m not a gambler but I will put money that any democratic watching this video you will change your words because you have been lied too to the highest degree my friends

  • steve thomas

    Remember, before the election took place Hillary was having one of her famous hissy fits saying that Trump possibly not trusting the outcome of the vote was practically a high crime. Well, now that she got her rear end beat in the election, what’s she doing? That, folks, is hypocrisy. But we shouldn’t be surprised. For Democrats, it comes naturally.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.