President Trump proposes cutting EPA Great Lakes Restoration funding 97 percent

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — President Trump's budget plan, leaked and first reported by the Oregonian, proposes cutting the Environmental Protection Agency's budget by roughly $2 billion. The largest of those proposed cuts nationwide would reduce the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative from $300 million to $10 million next year; a 97 percent cut.

“If we see any cuts, and certainly a cut that almost eliminates the Great Lakes Initiative it’s going to be an absolute disaster," said U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, (D) Michigan, to FOX 17 Friday.

Sen. Stabenow helped launch the GLRI in 2010 with an initial annual budget of $475 million, and bipartisan support. She and others including Congressman Bill Huizenga, (R) Michigan, have already stated they will push hard against these proposed cuts.

If the Trump administration's proposals are carried out, Senator Stabenow says Michigan's agriculture, fishing, tourism and boating industries are at real risk.

“It’s critical that we have a commitment from the federal government working with the state and local communities to deal with water quality issues, runoff into lakes, invasive species, the biggest one right now being Asian Carp," said Sen. Stabenow.

"But all of this relates to our ability to enjoy the Great Lakes; to be able to continue to depend on the Great Lakes for drinking water; for all of the fun that we have in the lakes as well as all the jobs that are created.”

While much of the GLRI funding is used for emergencies and currently combats Asian Carp-a leading invasive species threat to the Great Lakes-it also works to clean and restore shoreline, including Muskegon Lake.

"We’ve seen $22 million of this money go to Muskegon alone, just one of the many places that have been positively cleaned up as the result of this money," said Tim Eder, Great Lakes Commission executive director.

“We’re talking about people’s jobs here, this isn’t just about fishing about walking along the beach, this is real people’s jobs and property values. So it could be extremely devastating.”

Sen. Stabenow says it was also alarming this week when the White House stopped the Army Corps of Engineers from releasing their plan to stop Asian Carp 40 miles south of Chicago, at Brandon Road Lock and Dam. This is a plan she says has been worked on for more than a year.

FOX 17 also spoke with the National Association of Clean Air Agencies Executive Director Bill Becker Friday, who originally obtain the proposed budget and confirmed numbers to the Oregonian. While Becker would not release further documents, he confirmed the first page of the Trump administration's proposed budget to read: "The administrative budget blue print will prioritize rebuilding the military and making critical investments in the nation's security."

The President is reported to have asked for $54 billion increased spending for the military.

Leave a Reply to Huda Mann Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • George

    Except nothing was done about Asian carp and Zebra muscles in the past 8 years,but now SUDDENLY its an issue with Stabusnow

  • Old Bob

    Living in Michigan I certainly want to see all the great lakes projects go on. But, why should tax payers from all over the country who will never benefit from the great lakes help pay for it. I think the cost of great lake restoration should fall on the people who benefit from it. I certainly think the cost of cleaning up Muskegon Lake should fall on the people who live in Muskegon County.

    I don’t think state taxpayers should have to pay for Flints water problem. I don’t think state taxpayers should have to pay to clean up Muskegon Lake.

  • pat

    The problem is the money has gone everywhere but to where it was allocated. It primarily goes to salaries and useless studies.

  • Indisbelief

    I would think that Flint’s water problems and Muskegon Lake would be covered under the “Super Fund Act”. The Clean Water Act is still intact and is designed for pollution midigation. This Great Lakes Initiative seems like a duplication of services and a ton of money for someone’s pockets. I have heard forever that Chicago doesn’t want their channel to the Mississippi closed to keep the carp out. But now they want the GLI to pay for cleaning the carp from the Lakes? So what’s up with this GLI thinking?

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.