Bill would significantly cut Michigan’s high auto premiums

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan drivers would no longer be required to buy unlimited medical insurance to cover serious crash injuries under legislation that high-ranking supporters proposed Tuesday to significantly reduce the country’s most expensive auto premiums.

Michigan is the only state to mandate unlimited benefits. The bill backed by House Speaker Tom Leonard, Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan and others would let motorists stick with unlimited coverage or instead choose $250,000 or $500,000 of coverage — still a much higher level than is required in all but one other state, New Jersey, where it is $250,000.

Michigan drivers buying $250,000 of coverage would be guaranteed a 40 percent cut in personal injury protection fees, equaling a 20 percent reduction in the overall cost of a comprehensive policy and a nearly 50 percent cut on a basic policy. Those age 62 and older who have Medicare or other retiree health insurance could opt out entirely of personal injury protection, saving 35 percent.

“Forty-nine other states are doing just fine without this unlimited system,” Duggan, whose city has the highest car insurance rates in the U.S. and where many residents “drive dirty” with no insurance, said at a Capitol news conference. He outlined scenarios where an average driver could save $604 a year under the measure and a senior motorist could save $1,105.

Under one cost-saving provision in the bill, auto insurers would reimburse set fees to health providers for treating people injured in car crashes, similar to how Medicare works. Car insurers now pay three to four times more for X-rays and other medical services than health insurers do.

Many Republican lawmakers, some Democrats, black civil rights leaders, the head of the state Chamber of Commerce and a prominent trial lawyer joined in pushing changes. But the new bill was immediately opposed by a coalition of health providers, plaintiffs’ lawyers and patient advocates — whose concerns have blocked past legislative attempts to overhaul the insurance law, including legislation backed by Gov. Rick Snyder four years ago.

Critics said people with paralysis and brain injuries would not “get the care they need,” while proponents countered that their treatment would not stop but would be covered by their health insurer — not their auto insurer — once expenses exceed $250,000 or $500,000.

In the Senate, Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof, a West Olive Republican, opposes government-imposed rate rollbacks and fee schedules for auto-related injuries.

“We have a very broad coalition. That’s what it’s going to take to get this done,” said Leonard, a DeWitt Republican.

Michigan’s annual average auto insurance premium is $2,394, highest in the nation, according to The national average is $1,318.

Michigan Health & Hospital Association CEO Brian Peters called the legislation a “nonstarter,” saying it would not guarantee rate relief for all drivers, including those choosing unlimited personal injury coverage. Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson, who was seriously injured in a 2012 crash and who holds sway with GOP legislators in Detroit’s northern suburbs, called the bill a “robbery” that would benefit high-paid insurance executives.

But Pete Kuhnmuench, executive director of the Insurance Alliance of Michigan, said the system is “broken” and “outdated.” The industry group supports three elements to curtail costs: targeting fraud, stopping medical providers from overcharging car insurers and giving consumers a choice in their level of medical coverage. Auto insurers have previously opposed required cuts in premiums but did not immediately weigh in on that component of the bill Tuesday.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • steve

    Another way to reduce premiums is to recognize motorcycles as vehicles., and right now they’re not. For some asinine reason, cyclists are exempt from paying into the catastrophic fund, even thought in an accident, I’ve got to believe that a biker is more apt to be severely injured than a person driving a car. Make sense? Not to me, either.

    • Christopher

      Steve, every insured on-road vehicle in the state of Michigan is subject to the MCCA fees, even motorcycles although they do not receive the benefits. Insurance companies may label or recoup the fee as directly as labeling it “MCCA Fee” or as some type of “administrative fee”. You make a great point, however, motorcycle riders already contribute to the MCCA fee.

      • steve

        Is that “contribution” mandatory as it is for vehicle drivers or is it an option? By the way, I’m sure that the liberal compensation awards by the wacky courts add to the premiums we pay as well as the extra medical procedure costs from doctors to cover their butts in any lawsuit, frivolous or otherwise, brought by ambulance chasing lawyers.