Having trouble receiving FOX 17? Click here:

Trump declares victory now but legal perils far from over

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump may be reveling in what he sees as "complete and total exoneration" from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, but his legal perils are far from over.

Federal and state investigators in New York are deep into investigations of their own into Trump and those in his orbit, probes that some observers have long viewed as every bit as menacing as Mueller's two-year look into possible collusion with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election.

"They are very real and very significant," said Patrick J. Cotter, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. "If you're Trump, this has got to feel, in some ways, like an even greater threat than the Russia probe."

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are pursuing at least two known criminal inquiries, one focused into possible corruption in Trump's inaugural committee and another on the hush-money scandal that led his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to plead guilty last year to campaign-finance violations.

The president also faces inquiries from New York's attorney general, Letitia James, who recently opened a civil inquiry into Cohen's claims that Trump exaggerated his wealth when seeking loans for real estate projects and in a failed bid to buy the NFL's Buffalo Bills. Meanwhile, a state regulatory entity is looking into whether Trump gave false information to insurance companies.

Cohen told Congress in testimony last month he is in "constant contact" with prosecutors involving ongoing investigations.
Trump has dismissed the New York investigations as politically motivated harassment, a theme he and his supporters are likely to keep hammering in the wake of the Mueller findings.

The Justice Department declared Sunday that Mueller's two-year investigation found no evidence that Trump's campaign "conspired or coordinated" with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election, and did not come to a definitive answer on whether Trump obstructed justice.

Reacting to the findings in Florida on Sunday, Trump called the Mueller probe "an illegal takedown that failed."

The U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan declined to comment on the New York probes but has told a federal judge it is still investigating campaign-finance violations committed when Cohen helped orchestrate six-figure payments to a porn actress, Stormy Daniels, and a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, to keep them quiet during the campaign about alleged affairs with Trump.

Cohen says Trump ordered the payments and later reimbursed him for his efforts. So far, nobody besides Cohen has been charged.
Political observers have continued to speculate that Cohen, who is scheduled to report to prison in May, might secretly be providing investigators with additional information.

"If you've got Michael Cohen, the president's former lawyer, as a tour guide, that means you could go anywhere," former Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey told MSNBC recently.

Cohen stoked speculation when he told Congress he was aware of other "wrongdoing" involving Trump but couldn't talk about it because it was "part of the investigation that's currently being looked at by the Southern District of New York."

Among other things, he suggested prosecutors were investigating communications he had with either Trump or one of his representatives in spring 2018 in the months after the FBI raided his home and office. At the time, Cohen was looking for information about whether Trump might consider giving him a pardon.

The president has denied breaking any laws and dismissed Cohen as a liar. He derided the state investigations in New York as a "witch hunt," calling the state and its Democratic governor and attorney general "proud members of the group of PRESIDENTIAL HARASSERS."

Trump says the payments to Daniels and McDougal were a private matter unrelated to his campaign.

The White House has said Trump was not involved in the operations of his inaugural committee, which raised $107 million to celebrate his election.

The inquiry into the committee has focused partly on whether donors received "benefits" after making contributions or whether foreign nationals made barred donations, according to a subpoena sent to the committee. The same document shows prosecutors are looking at whether the committee's vendors were paid with unreported donations.

The U.S. Justice Department has held for nearly a half-century that a sitting president is constitutionally immune from criminal prosecution, a conclusion Cotter, the former prosecutor, referred to as Trump's "ace in the hole."

If prosecutors find evidence Trump committed a crime, they could wait to charge him after he leaves office, though the legal deadline for filing charges is five years for most federal offenses, including the campaign-finance violations in question in the Cohen case.

The possibility of Trump's re-election has raised questions about whether that deadline could be tolled — suspended — for the duration of his presidency.

Jennifer Rodgers, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, said it's unlikely a judge would allow that because no law expressly forbids charges against a sitting president. Tolling the statute of limitations is typically reserved for circumstances beyond the government's control, like when a defendant becomes a fugitive.

"The DOJ, in fact, could proceed with a case" against the president, said Rodgers, who lectures at Columbia Law School. "They aren't because of their own policy."

James, New York's attorney general, also has a pending lawsuit alleging Trump and his family illegally ran the Trump Foundation as an extension of his businesses and presidential campaign. And she has called for a "full examination" of a New York Times report accusing Trump's family of benefiting from "dubious tax schemes" in the 1990s.

The foundation has agreed to dissolve. Its lawyers have argued that the lawsuit is flimsy and politically motivated.

Experts have said the president is unlikely to be criminally prosecuted over the tax matters, which are far past the statute of limitations, but state officials could pursue Trump for millions of dollars in civil fines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

7 comments

  • On It

    The pathetic media. Still trying to carry water in a bucket with no bottom. Just stop it already. Let me give you some ideas about what to cover, the dossier….how did that become legit, by whom, & whomever signed all those fisa (spying on the opposition) warrants. Here’s another one…..Seth Rich. I could go on, but the media already has their agenda set.

  • dace

    “If you’re Trump, this has got to feel, in some ways, like an even greater threat than the Russia probe.” yeah, yeah,….we’ve heard it all before.

  • Shiffhead

    Yes, full investigation to take place now.
    All of the FBI and DOJ involved in what now appears to be an act of treason. Possibly a disbanding of the FBI and replace it wth something that can once again hold themselves with integrity, because it does not seem like they had or now have any.
    I never once thought that the President colluded with the russians but with all the media screaming of the evidence and impending impeachment, I figured they must have something, or why would they try so hard to damage America like this.
    This seems to be a total fraud from the start, and has cost our country so much. Someone must be held accountable.

  • steve

    I truly hope that when the Democrats ‘demand’ to see the report in its entirety I hope that they’re told in a very loud voice to go to hell.

  • DemSoreLosers

    Journalism is dead. Opinion writers published thousands of articles telling America that the President of the United States would be charged with collusion and obstruction. Now you cannot even find an article that Mueller cleared the President of collusion and the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General (who assigned Mueller as the Special Prosecutor) concluded that the President was not guilty of obstruction. All we get is the same old tripe in this article. The so called “media” are angry/upset that they have not been able to get the American public to turn on President Trump. Democrats still cannot accept the results of the 2016 election.

  • Truth

    So this should be labeled as an Op Ed.
    The AP has gone the way of CNN, and no longer has any integrity as a news source. The articles they produce are rife with bias against President Trump, and are now just party-line propaganda.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.