Judge rejects Trump challenge to release of his tax returns

U.S. President Donald Trump returns to the White House after visiting Walter Reed National Military Medical Center October 04, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge rejected President Donald Trump’s claim to be immune from all criminal investigations Monday and dismissed his lawsuit challenging a state grand jury subpoena for eight years of his tax returns sought by Manhattan’s district attorney.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said in his ruling that he could not grant such a “categorical and limitless assertion of presidential immunity.”

Trump’s lawyers immediately appealed to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, also based in Manhattan, meaning the returns are unlikely to be turned over immediately.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr., a Democrat, asked Trump’s accounting firm to turn over his business and personal tax returns as part of an investigation of the Trump Organization’s involvement in buying the silence of two women who claimed to have had affairs with the president.

Trump’s lawyers have said the investigation is politically motivated and the request for his tax records should be stopped because he is immune from any criminal probe as long as he is president.

In striking down Trump’s attempt to block the subpoena, Marrero called Trump’s claim of a broad immunity “extraordinary” and “an overreach of executive power.”

“As the court reads it, presidential immunity would stretch to cover every phase of criminal proceedings, including investigations, grand jury proceedings and subpoenas, indictment, prosecution, arrest, trial, conviction, and incarceration,” Marrero wrote. “That constitutional protection presumably would encompass any conduct, at any time, in any forum, whether federal or state, and whether the President acted alone or in concert with other individuals.”

The judge said couldn’t accept that legal view, “especially in the light of the fundamental concerns over excessive arrogation of power that animated the Constitution’s delicate structure and its calibrated balance of authority among the three branches of the national government, as well as between the federal and state authorities.”

Trump’s lawyers and the district attorney’s office did not immediately comment in response to the ruling.

Justice Department lawyers in Washington, who had urged Marrero to delay deciding the issue, declined to comment.

Vance began his probe after federal prosecutors in Manhattan completed their investigation into payments that Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, arranged to be paid to porn actress Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal to keep them silent during the presidential race. The Trump Organization later reimbursed Cohen.

Cohen is serving a three-year prison sentence for crimes that included campaign finance violations.

Trump was never charged, though prosecutors said publicly that he was aware of and directed the illegal payments. Justice Department policy has long been that sitting presidents cannot be charged criminally.

Grand jury proceedings and records in New York are secret. If Vance gains access to Trump’s returns through a grand jury investigation, that doesn’t mean that their contents would be disclosed publicly.

It is unclear what Trump’s returns might have to do with the criminal investigation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

9 comments

  • C

    What business does a civilian have in demanding to see Trump’s tax returns in the first place? That’s no different than me demanding to see your tax returns. It’s none of their business. But, any objections from Trump will be dismissed by this judge who was appointed by Bill Clinton and will be anything but impartial. I hope that any action by Trump to counter this Democrat crap at least gets an unbiased outcome from an apolitical judge.

    • Not racist not violent but no longer silent

      I agree. And if this is the precedence I want to see all returns of ALL public officials from now on. Same thing with presidential phone calls.

      I’d jump on board the anti Trump train IF I saw the ones after him were truly out for America.. not partisan politics.. and so far the Democrats and retractors are FAR worse than our president.

  • Sick of the crap

    You tax file is between you and the IRS. If they haven’t called you into court, it’s NOBODY else’s business!

  • Ej

    Why is it that 90% of WXMIs articles are all regurgitated from the communist news network (CNN) or from AP ? Don’t have any talent there ?

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.