Sources: Trump will ask Congress, not Mexico, to pay for border wall

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team has signaled to congressional Republican leaders that the President-elect’s preference is to fund the border wall through the appropriations process as soon as April, according to House Republican officials.

The move would break a key campaign promise when Trump repeatedly said he would force Mexico to pay for the construction of the wall along the border.

The Trump team argues it will have the authority through a Bush-era 2006 law to build the wall, lawmakers say, but it lacks the money to do so. Transition officials have told House GOP leaders in private meetings they’d like to pay for the wall in the funding bill, a senior House GOP source said.

“It was not done in the Obama administration, so by funding the authorization that’s already happened a decade ago, we could start the process of meeting Mr. Trump’s campaign pledge to secure the border,” Indiana Republican Rep. Luke Messer said on Thursday.

Messer admitted it’s “big dollars, but it’s a question of priorities.” He pointed to a border security bill that Homeland Security Chairman Mike McCaul proposed last year that cost roughly $10 billion.

“Democrats may well find themselves in the position to shut down all of government to stop the buildout of a wall, or of a barrier, or of a fence,” Messer said.

If Mexico refuses to pay for the wall the GOP could add billions of dollars into the spending bill that needs to pass by April 28 to keep the government open. But doing so would force a showdown with Senate Democrats and potentially threaten a government shutdown.

No decisions have been made, GOP sources said.

Republicans point out that then-Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Chuck Schumer and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton voted for the 2006 bill and argued that since Democrats backed that bill, they should support efforts to fund the current effort.

The thinking behind the strategy is that it is harder for Democrats to filibuster spending bills because of the high stakes involved if they fail to pass in time.

Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 3 Republican in the House leadership, declined to say Thursday if Congress would pay for the wall.

“We want President Trump to have all the tools he needs to build the wall,” Scalise said. “We’re in talks with him on the details of it as they’re still putting together their team. We still got a few months before there’s another funding bill that’s going to move. We’re going to work with him to make sure we can get it done. We want to build a wall. He wants to build a wall.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • korg

    Campaign promises breaking already, and the man isn’t even president yet. This is just the beginning…

    But hey, I don’t blame him. I blame all the people that put him into power.

    Perfect example of catering to the uneducated.

      • steve thomas

        Since Hillary would prefer nations without borders, a wall wouldn’t be needed and all the countries of the world would now be called “Earth”, and she’d be the Queen for Life.

  • steve

    Building a wall was a campaign promise that mad me cringe every time he said it. To begin with it’s not feasible. I would have liked to hear him say that he was going to pull several thousand of our armed personnel scattered around the world to man the border with the mission to intercept illegals and treat them accordingly. There could be a half dozen checkpoints at which they could legally cross after being thoroughly vetted. Any other attempted crossing would be considered for what it is. Illegal, with consequences that could include the use of weapons. Look at the amount of personnel that we have stationed around the world. I’d guess there’d be a lot of people that would jump at the chance to be on the border defending our country from illegals. Again, legal entry would still be available, but at those places of our choosing, and not wherever the illegals might choose. After all, it’s our ballpark where we should be setting the rules, not them.